Sustainable packaging impact assessment

Packaging has a big role in environmental challenges. Here's what you need to know about assessing packaging impacts and making better choices:

• The Market: The sustainable packaging market was worth $283.37 billion in 2024 and is expected to nearly double by 2033. Consumers care - 79% consider environmental impact when buying.

• Key Metrics to Assess: Focus on carbon footprint, resource use, and recyclability. Tools like Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) help measure these impacts.

• Packaging Materials: PET plastic has a lower carbon footprint compared to glass, aluminum, or paper, but end-of-life management (like recycling) matters too.

• Real-World Examples: Companies like Microsoft, Dell, and Coca-Cola are cutting emissions by switching materials, reducing packaging volume, or using recycled content.

• Tools to Use: LCA software like SimaPro, GaBi, and Devera simplify impact analysis, offering data-driven insights for better decisions.

Takeaway: To reduce your packaging's environmental impact, start with an LCA, use automated tools, and focus on recyclable, low-impact materials. It’s a win for the planet and your brand.

Role of Lifecycle Analysis in Sustainable Packaging Decisions

Life Cycle Assessment Methods

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) provides a detailed way to measure the environmental impact of packaging materials throughout their entire lifecycle. From raw material extraction to final disposal, LCA helps evaluate and guide packaging choices based on measurable data.

LCA Steps for Packaging

LCA involves four main stages, each focusing on a specific aspect of environmental evaluation:

For example, the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement conducted a study in 2014 on U.S. corrugated products. It compared data from 2006 to 2014, showing how better recycled fiber recovery and improved mill energy systems led to measurable gains in environmental performance.

Measuring Environmental Effects

LCAs highlight several critical environmental indicators:

• Carbon/Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Tracks the carbon footprint across the supply chain.

• Water Depletion: Measures water usage and its impact on local resources.

• Resource Usage: Evaluates the consumption of minerals and land.

• Toxicity Levels: Assesses harmful substances released during production and disposal.

"Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) can produce convincing evidence that intuition is no longer enough."
– Dr. Karli Verghese FAIP

Interestingly, over 80% of a product's environmental impact stems from supply chain activities.

Industry Rules and Standards

To ensure reliable and consistent results, LCAs follow established frameworks and guidelines, such as:

• ISO 14040/14044: The primary framework for conducting LCAs.

• GHG Protocol: Provides guidance for calculating greenhouse gas emissions.

• PEF/OEF Standards: European Commission standards for environmental footprint assessments.

For instance, Tetra Pak Oceania conducted a comparison of beverage and food packaging in Australia and New Zealand, adhering strictly to ISO 14040/14044 protocols.

European Union Packaging Directives

For the year 2030 the EU have set the following targets:

• 65% packaging waste recycling

• Significant reduction in single-use plastics

• Mandatory recycled content requirements

Material Carbon Footprint Data

Understanding how different packaging materials contribute to carbon emissions is crucial for businesses aiming to make informed, environmentally conscious choices. Recent studies have shed light on the environmental impact of various packaging options, offering insights into production processes, end-of-life scenarios, and emission reduction strategies.

Material Carbon Footprint Data

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) data provides a clear picture of the emissions linked to specific materials. For instance, in 2019, global primary plastic production was responsible for around 2.24 gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent - roughly 5.3% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Here's how common packaging materials compare:

Among plastics, polyethylene (22%), PET (21%), and polypropylene (15%) are the largest contributors to emissions, with around 75% of these emissions occurring before the polymerization stage.

What Influences Carbon Output

Production Factors:

• Sourcing and processing of raw materials

• Energy needed for manufacturing

• Transportation, influenced by material weight

• Material properties like permeability

End-of-Life Factors:

• Disposal methods, such as recycling, composting, or landfilling

• Recyclability of the material

• Availability and efficiency of waste management systems

"To understand the true carbon footprint of packaging, we believe it is important to take an end-to-end view of the value chain and apply a science-based approach to quantifying emissions profiles." – McKinsey

Real-World Efforts to Cut Emissions

Practical applications of these insights show how businesses can reduce both costs and emissions through smarter packaging.

Dell Technologies: Simplified their laptop packaging, achieving:

• An 18% reduction in packaging volume

• The elimination of 20 million pounds of packaging materials

• Notable cost savings alongside environmental benefits

Coca-Cola: Launched the "World Without Waste" initiative, focusing on:

• Increased use of recycled PET in bottles

• Aiming for 100% recyclable packaging by 2025

• Promoting circular economy principles

P&G: Rolled out a sustainability program for packaging, which includes:

• A commitment to 100% recyclable or reusable packaging by 2030

• Switching to soy-based inks and water-based coatings

• Reducing the amount of packaging materials used overall

These examples highlight how thoughtful packaging strategies can lead to meaningful emission reductions while also cutting costs. Companies that evaluate their packaging processes from start to finish often uncover opportunities to make a positive environmental impact.

Assessment Software Options

Choosing the right assessment software is essential for accurate impact analysis. The right tool not only simplifies the evaluation process but also ensures precise results. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tools today come in various forms to cater to different business requirements and budgets.

Top LCA Software Tools

Here are some popular LCA tools used for packaging analysis:

Devera is particularly notable for adhering to the ISO 14040 methodology and utilizing data from trusted sources like Ecoinvent and OpenLCA. This ensures compliance and reliable data for packaging assessments.

How to Pick Assessment Software

When selecting LCA software for packaging analysis, focus on these key areas:

Data Quality and Sources

• Comprehensive and up-to-date databases

• Integration with industry standards

• Reliable verification methods

Usability Features

• Automation to save time

• Ease of use and learning curve

• Availability of technical support

• Efficient report generation

Business Considerations

• Pricing that fits your budget

• Scalability to grow with your needs

• Compatibility with existing systems

• Meeting compliance requirements

Devera is an excellent example of software that offers automated, user-friendly solutions for businesses adapting to changing demands.

Devera: Automated Impact Analysis

Devera takes automated LCA to the next level, making it a top choice for companies focused on efficient packaging assessments. From data collection to reporting, the platform simplifies every step, making it especially useful for businesses prioritizing sustainable packaging.

"This is a game-changer tool to solve Life Cycle Assessment in the industry with the potential to replace costly consulting services."

• Pedro Olazabal, Head of Impact

Some of Devera's standout features include:

• Automated assessments across all stages of a product's lifecycle

• Real-time updates to reflect product changes instantly

• Integration with e-commerce platforms for seamless operations

• Full compliance with ISO 14040/44 and GHG Protocol standards

"This product is a powerful differentiator for e-commerce businesses and brands aiming to outshine their competitors."

Devera's pricing is flexible, based on the number of SKUs and integration needs, making it adaptable for businesses of various sizes.

Common Problems and Solutions

This section dives into the challenges of conducting accurate life cycle assessments (LCAs) and offers practical solutions. Accurate LCAs often struggle with issues like data quality, methodology inconsistencies, and implementation hurdles. Here's how to address these effectively.

Improving Data Quality

The quality of data directly affects the accuracy of LCAs. With supply chains accounting for over 80% of environmental impact, reliable data collection is essential. Here are some common challenges and how to tackle them:

Enhancing LCA Accuracy

To make LCAs more reliable, organizations should focus on managing uncertainties and maintaining strict quality control.

Uncertainty Management

• Establish clear minimum and maximum values for critical variables.

• Conduct scenario testing to understand how sensitive results are to changes.

• Use Monte Carlo analysis for handling complex data sets.

Quality Control

• Cross-check data against established benchmarks.

• Standardize allocation methods, especially for processes involving multiple products.

• Clearly document any assumptions or methodological decisions.

Applying LCA Results

Turning LCA findings into actionable strategies requires a structured approach.

Material Selection and Process Improvements

• Use LCA insights to choose materials with lower environmental impact, focus on high-impact areas, and track measurable progress.

Consumer expectations also drive these efforts. Over 81% of consumers believe companies should take steps to protect the environment. This makes accurate LCAs not just an ethical choice but a smart business move.

Conclusion

Why Measure Impact

Evaluating packaging impact is crucial for identifying areas to improve, staying competitive, and strengthening your brand. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) offers a structured way to analyze and refine packaging across its entire lifecycle.

Relying on outdated methods like manual data collection and expensive consulting is no longer practical. Automated tools have reshaped the process, making it faster, more cost-effective, and accessible. Here's a quick comparison:

This shift highlights how modern tools simplify assessments, allowing businesses to take meaningful steps more efficiently.

Steps to Start Now

To begin assessing your packaging's impact, follow these steps:

• Set clear goals that align with your sustainability and business priorities.

• Perform an LCA using the ISO 14040 framework to ensure a thorough analysis.

• Use automated tools that can integrate seamlessly with your systems, like e-commerce platforms.

• Keep your data updated, particularly when emission factors change.

Turn these insights into practical changes that lower your environmental footprint while maintaining packaging performance. Sticking to standards like ISO 14040 and the GHG Protocol ensures your assessments are accurate and trustworthy.

Related posts

• 12 best ways to avoid greenwashing and comply with the Green Claim normative

• Cosmetic brands sustainability reports and LCA calculations: the very best practices.

• Is it really worthy to measure product carbon footprint performing LCA?

• “Environmentally friendly” lacks detail: Let’s quantify that